ART-DECOR Governance

1 Summary

TODO

1.1 Guidelines

TODO

1.2 Governance

TODO

2 Introduction

2.1 Purpose

TODO

2.2 Scope

TODO

2.3 Process of developing

TODO

2.4 Evolving document

TODO

3 Guidelines

3.1 Languages

3.1.1 Art-Decor

TODO

3.1.2 Art-Decor export to Wiki

TODO

3.1.3 Wiki

TODO

3.1.4 Implementation guides / exchange formats

TODO

3.2 OIDs

3.2.1 Implementation Guide

For each Implementation Guide an OID with the following child nodes shall be created:

OID Struktur für ELGA Implementierungsleitfäden basierend auf HL7 CDA

3.2.2 Art-Decor root OIDs

All Art-Decor templates shall be placed below the OID 2.16.756.5.30.1.1.10 (hl7-ch-domains/decor-templates). All Art-Decor value-sets shall be placed below the OID 2.16.756.5.30.1.1.11 (hl7-ch-domains/decor-valuesets).

OID tree for Art-Decor templates and value sets

3.2.3 Root OIDs for templates

OIDs for Art-Decor templates shall be drawn according to their CDA template types from the corresponding following child nodes:

.1 Document Level Template

.2 Header Level Template

.3 Section Level Template

.4 Entry Level Template

.9 other CDA Fragment Template

3.2.4 Versioning of document-level templates

TODO

3.2.5 Versioning of value sets

TODO

3.2.6 OIDs to be registered

TODO

3.3 Art-Decor

3.3.1 Repositories

3.3.1.1 Art-Decor BBR

TODO

3.3.2 Governance Groups

TODO

3.3.2.1 Artefact status in repositories

In a repository, artefacts shall be initially created in the status 'draft'. When finished, reviewed and endorsed, an artefact’s status can be changed in the repository according the rules of the responsible governance group (see Art-Decor.org/Template Editor for the Art-Decor default state/event diagram). Chapter #Repositories contains the description of the detailed process and responsibilities.

3.3.3 Documentation

3.3.3.1 Templates

TODO

3.3.3.2 Standard references

TODO

3.3.4 Datasets

3.3.4.1 Language

See chapter #Languages for language guidelines.

3.3.4.2 Optionality

TODO

3.3.4.4 Minimum Description

TODO

3.3.5 Naming conventions for templates

TODO

3.3.6 Naming conventions for value sets

TODO

3.4 Mediawiki

3.4.1 Structure of an Implementation Guide

To ensure a consistent approach and display of the implementation guide, the following (minimum, German) structure is recommended:

TODO

3.4.2 Schematic View of Templates

TODO

3.4.3 Revisions

TODO

3.5 Releases

3.5.1 Art-Decor

TODO

3.5.2 Wiki

3.5.2.1 Check before finalizing

Thew folowing checks help to identify possible errors or missing includes from Art-Decor. Templates from other repositories than under the governance from eHealth Suisse need to be imported separatly. Please send the necessary OID and related project information to the Art-Decor Support.

• Perform search for:
  • "/dynamic"
  • "/static"
  • "Cannot find"
  • ...

Afterwards: Create a revision according to Wiki revisions.

4 Governance

4.1 Responsibilities

4.1.1 Support for Art-Decor

TODO

4.1.2 Governance Groups

TODO

4.1.3 Repositories

TODO

4.1.4 Wiki

TODO

4.2 Art-Decor artifact states

The following state/event diagram shows the default states and possbile transitions for an artifact within Art-Decor:

Default state diagram for Art-Decor artefacts

Each Governance Group may decide to avoid some of these states. It is not recommended to add new states by a Governance Group.

Art-Decor state machine

Status	Action	Trigger / Description	Example for CDA-CH	Responsibility
draft	activate	Artefact is finished and it is considered as final (no review needed).	n/a for CDA-CH as review necessary.	Developer
	consider	If an artefact is considered to be moved into a repository, this action is applied and the artefact has to be reviewed by the owner/team of the repository.	final draft for a CDA-CH V2 template ready to review.	Developer (info to the Reviewer)
	cancel	If an artefact is not further developed, it is cancelled.	any developed draft template not to be used anymore.	Developer
pending	activate	Upon decision of the review team.	CDA-CH V2 template has been reviewed within HL7 Switzerland and was considered to be ready for release.	Review team of the repository.
	reject	If the artefact is considered as not appropriate for the repository, it's rejected.	HL7 Switzerland does not consider the template.	Review team of the repository.
rejected		Decision necessary for what next status applies, it is recommended to set the status to draft and re-evaluate it for a repository or set is as active only within the project.	As appropriate, propose to set it to draft again or move it to another BBR.	Developer
active	review	Maintenance or update of a project/repository.	Review CDA-CH template to consider it for CDA-CH v2.	Repository / Project owner
	retire	In case of a new version, the old version is retired in order to have only one valid version of an artefact.	A CDA-CH template is not used anymore or replaced by another one.	Repository / Project owner
pre-publication review	reactivate	If updated and considered as final by the responsible person, the artefact is re-activated.	template is reviewed within HL7 Switzerland and considered to be ready for release.	Repository / Project owner
	retire		A CDA-CH template is not used anymore or replaced by another one.

4.3 Quality Assurance & Review

4.3.1 Art-Decor Repository

TODO

4.3.2 Implementation Guides

TODO

4.3.3 Official ELGA implementation guides

TODO

5 Annex

5.1 Links

• Workspace
• Art-Decor Open Tools
• eHealth Wiki
• eHealth Suisse
• Art-Decor Google Group

5.4 List of future definitions

TODO